SILLY COURTCourt of Petty Grievances

Official Publication — Annotated Edition

Unflattering Publication

C.P.G. § 6.3 · Chapter 6 — Offenses Against Digital Peace · Digital Misdemeanor

C.P.G. § 6.3Unflattering Publication

Digital Misdemeanor

A person is guilty of Unflattering Publication when they post, share, or otherwise publish a photograph or video OF another person that the depicted person would not have approved — mid-blink, mid-bite, mid-sneeze — without consent, or when they engage in vaguebooking such that the household must guess who has offended them.

Definitions
Vaguebooking”.
A public statement engineered to be about someone without naming them — 'some people will just never change' — such that everyone must apply for the role.
The blink ratio”.
Where the poster looks excellent and the depicted looks felled, the ratio is presumed intentional.
Elements (proof required: a preponderance of the evidence)
  1. The accused published an image or video depicting the complainant, or a statement plainly about them
  2. The complainant did not consent to the publication
  3. A reasonable person of ordinary pettiness would object to the depiction or the vagueness
Recognized defenses
  • The Candid Doctrine — the image is genuinely flattering and the objection is modesty (the jury decides with their eyes)
  • The Public Event Defense — the depicted was performing publicly at the time, on a stage, on purpose
Aggravating circumstances
  • Better photographs from the same moment existed and were withheld
  • The caption included 'no filter'
Sentencing guideline: Takedowns, approval regimes, and flattering-photo restitution.
Sentences this court has been known to hand down
  • takedown of the offending publication within 24 hours, including from stories and highlights
  • a two-photo approval regime: the depicted approves all future posts featuring them, for six months
  • publication of three (3) flattering photographs of the complainant, selected by the complainant

Commentary: A nod to the real right of publicity and to New York Civil Rights Law §§ 50–51, which have protected against unauthorized use of a person's likeness since 1903 — after a court famously found no such right and the legislature disagreed within a year.

📨 Someone violated this section? Serve them

The first case is always free. The verdict is always meaningless.

Other offenses in Chapter 6 — Offenses Against Digital Peace

The Code of Petty Grievances is a work of comedy. It is not legal advice, it is not law, and citing it in an actual courtroom will end poorly and hilariously, in that order.